Sushant Case getting complicated day by day: Subramanian Swamy raised questions on 2 ambulances
The demand for an impartial inquiry into the alleged suicide of bollywood star Sushant Singh Rajput has been steadily increasing. BJP MP Subramanian Swamy has raised many questions on this issue. He said why two ambulances were called after the actor’s death? Why is it not investigated who called two ambulances on the spot?
Subramanian Swamy has been advocating a CBI inquiry into the case from the beginning. In a tweet in the case, Subramanian Swamy wrote that Samuel, who is the manager of Sushant’s house, has no whereabouts. What the hell are the two Samuel saying? Swamy mentions two Samuel’s, the first one who lived jointly with Sushant Singh Rajput. The second one was made by Rhea Chakraborty as the manager of Sushant’s house.
Three different information related to the time of Sushant Singh’s death has been revealed in the report published by Republic TV. Ambulance owner Laxman Bandgar gave this information while talking to Republic TV. He said the Mumbai police had taken the body. Siddharth Pithani had said that he cut the cloth with a knife and removed the body of Sushant. At the same time, Akshay Bundagar (ambulance driver) said that he had taken the body.
Also Swami said that Samuel has no information. Sushant’s house manager Samuel Miranda was last seen on 6 August. When he was summoned by the Enforcement Directorate for 9 hours of questioning. He did not speak to the media after leaving there. Earlier, he had recorded his statement to the Bihar Police. According to neighbors, no information has been received since that day.
On the other hand, Samuel Haokip, the flatmate of Sushant Singh Rajput, demanded a CBI inquiry on the issue. He also said that he does not want to rely on any information shown or disclosed by the media. Samuel also said that he did not trust anything said by Siddharth Pithani. Therefore, he wants a CBI inquiry into the matter.
Apart from this, Sanjay Raut has also consistently favored the Government of Maharashtra on Sushant Singh Rajput case. During this, he also made several controversial statements. In a recent statement, Sanjay Raut said, “We have full sympathy with Sushant Singh’s family. My words said in the past meant that everyone should be patient. Whereas it was shown as if I am threatening them. “
Do people really think that I made any threats? Trust the Mumbai Police, if you do not trust him, then demand a CBI inquiry. Apart from this, Sanjay Raut also said many things about Sushant Singh’s case. He said Sushant Singh was like our son. He lived in Mumbai and was a great artist. After all, what will be our enmity with him? We ourselves wish that the secrets behind this death should come out.
Earlier, according to a Times Now report, Sanjay Raut was now talking about keeping quiet from politicians to Sushant’s family. Shiv Sena leader Sanjay Raut had said that this investigation is about to end now. In such a situation, everyone should remain calm until the investigation is complete. Sanjay Raut said that Sushant’s family or any political party should all remain silent.
Earlier Shiv Sena MP Sanjay Raut had written an article in the party mouthpiece Saamana in the past, in which he commented on Sushant’s family. In this, he had said that Sushant’s father has done two marriages and since the second marriage Sushant and his father’s relationship was not good.